For renewable asset owners running Qantum

A Qantum MCP server that answers from your plants under each user's own Qantum login

A Qantum MCP server gives Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot named tools for plants, active alarms, monthly production and CMMS issues. QOS Energy publishes the Qantum API v2 as a public Postman collection with token login. QOS Energy ships no MCP server as of 21 September 2026, so Pexon builds one against your tenant.

Why Qantum is hard for agents

Where a Qantum connection needs engineering, not configuration

01 · Naming

Qantum, QOS Energy, Univers

The product is Qantum, the company QOS Energy, the parent Univers, formerly Envision Digital. Univers also owns Bazefield, so roadmaps may converge, and the blueprint checks which contact owns your API access.

02 · Docs

Endpoints are public, fields are not

The Postman collection shows endpoints and filters but no field-level reference. The formal /doc endpoint needs separate credentials, so field mapping is confirmed against your tenant.

03 · Lookup

Sensor IDs are tenant-specific

Sensor IDs and referent types such as EnergyActiveMeter differ per tenant. The agent needs a lookup step before any measurement makes sense.

04 · Identity

User login, not scoped keys

The API logs in with user credentials rather than scoped API keys. That keeps each person's Qantum permissions in force, and it means the connector has to handle each user's session.

Checked 21 September 2026

Qantum at a glance: interfaces, access and what exists for AI

What we found
InterfacesQantum API v2 (REST/JSON, docs public): public Postman collection from QOS Energy with JSON:API-style filters, includes and paging; no field-level reference, the /doc endpoint needs separate credentials
AuthenticationPOST /user/login with login and password returns a token that is sent as a bearer token on every other request. There are no scoped API keys; the user's own Qantum permissions apply.
Vendor MCP serverNo vendor server. No QOS Energy, Qantum or Univers MCP server found in searches or MCP directories.
Vendor AI assistantThe parent company Univers markets a Physical AI platform (EnOS) for energy and utilities; no Qantum-specific assistant found.
Other connectorsNone found.

QOS Energy, part of Univers (formerly Envision Digital) since July 2022 (FR). Solar, wind and storage asset owners, independent power producers and O&M providers in Europe, the US and India, strong in commercial and industrial solar; at the 2022 acquisition QOS Energy monitored more than 8,000 plants totalling 10 GW in 23 countries.

What we build

A first Qantum tool list, written as the manifest your IT team signs

Built on what QOS Energy, part of Univers (formerly Envision Digital) since July 2022 documents: portfolios and folders, sites and plants, inverters and solar strings, sensors and data acquisition modules, sensor measurements (raw, daily, monthly), active statuses and events, energy prices, CMMS issues. Backends named below are documented resources; "confirmed in blueprint" means the vendor documentation sits behind a login and the resource is checked against your release first.

# qos-energy-mcp-server: tool manifest, draft for blueprint week 1
# Every tool runs as the person asking. Nothing is written without a person confirming.
tools:
  list_plants:              # portfolio or tag -> plants with site data
    backend: GET /plants
    mode: read
  get_active_alarms:        # portfolio, severity -> active statuses per plant
    backend: GET /active-statuses
    mode: read
  get_monthly_measurements: # plant, sensors, date range -> monthly values
    backend: GET /sensors/measurements/monthly
    mode: read
  list_cmms_issues:         # date range, plant -> maintenance issues
    backend: GET /cmms/issues
    mode: read
  get_energy_prices:        # plant or tag -> energy prices
    backend: GET /energy-prices
    mode: read
  draft_issue_update:       # issue ID, change -> proposed update for a person to confirm before it is sent
    backend: PATCH /cmms/issues/{id}
    mode: propose
audit: every call logged with user, tool, arguments and the Qantum response

The manifest is the contract. A question that needs an operation not on it gets a new line and a review, not a wider permission.

Qantum holds the records. An assistant without a governed way in answers from whatever someone pasted into the chat. The connector is the governed way in: named operations, the person's own permissions, every call logged.

What the connector answers, and what it will not do

Questions it answers

  • Which plants in portfolio X have critical or major active statuses right now?
  • What was the monthly energy production of plant Y over the last quarter?
  • Which CMMS issues opened last month are still not closed?

What it will not do

  • Read more than the asking user may read in Qantum; every call runs under that person's own login.
  • Change or close a CMMS issue by itself: the only write tool proposes an update that a person confirms.
  • Replace portfolio reporting: long-range analysis across all plants belongs in a data warehouse.

When this is the wrong page

If your team only needs dashboards and alarm handling, Qantum's own interface does that and QOS Energy maintains it. A connector is right when Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot has to answer from Qantum data or combine it with contracts, ERP or e-mail.

Start with the Readiness Blueprint.

Two weeks, €4,900 fixed price. Week one agrees the tool list with your Qantum owners and checks every backend against your release and licence. Week two tests whether a person's own Qantum permissions reach through the connector. You keep the manifest and a costed build plan, whoever builds it. All prices are net and exclude VAT.

What we need from you: a named Qantum administrator, a test or sandbox system we may call, and one business owner who can say which questions the assistant should answer first. The first production connector is usually a use-case pilot from €15,000; it runs in your environment, and the code is yours.

Sources: Postman: Qantum API v2 · Envision Digital acquires QOS Energy (2022) · Univers energy and utilities · Qantum support centre. Read 21 September 2026. Vendor documentation changes; verify against the current release.

Related

Questions Qantum teams ask before the first tool call

Does Qantum have its own MCP server?

Not as of 21 September 2026. We found no MCP server from QOS Energy, Qantum or the parent Univers in searches or MCP directories. An MCP server has to be built against the public Qantum API v2, which is what this page describes.

Do we need extra QOS Energy licences or access for an AI connector?

The Qantum API v2 logs in with normal Qantum user credentials, and the formal /doc reference needs separate credentials. Check with QOS Energy whether API use is covered by your contract; the blueprint answers this before any tool is built.

Can the assistant see data a user is not allowed to see in Qantum?

No. Each call runs under a token from the asking person's own Qantum login, so Qantum's permissions decide every answer. Two users asking the same question can get two different answers, and that is tested before go-live.

What does a Qantum connector cost?

The two-week Readiness Blueprint is fixed at €4,900: agreed tool list, backends checked against your release, identity tested end to end, costed build plan. The production connector is usually a use-case pilot from €15,000. Prices are net, excluding VAT.

Next step

Not a sales call. An architecture call.

Thirty minutes with the engineer who would build the connector, with your Qantum administrator in the room if you like.